Christianity: Details about 'The Book Of Mormon'
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home
|
The Book of Mormon is one of four sacred texts of Mormonism, which also include the Bible, Pearl of Great Price, and Doctrine and Covenants. Published by the first prophet of this movement, Joseph Smith, Jr., in March 1830 in Palmyra, New York, the belief in the truthfulness of this book stands as the central dividing doctrine of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints from other Christian faiths. Adherents to its teachings are commonly referred to as Mormons. The book's self-declared purpose is to testify of Jesus through the writings of ancient prophets of the Western Hemisphere who traveled there from ancient Israel, probably between 600-650 BC. It asserts that it was abridged and compiled by the prophet/historian Mormon, and his son Moroni in the 4th century, for "the convincing of the Jew and Gentile that Jesus is the Christ, the Eternal God." Joseph Smith is said to have translated the record by divine inspiration with assistance from the Urim and Thummim. Along with the Bible, which is also held to be the Word of God, the Book of Mormon is esteemed as part of the canon of churches that grew out of the Latter Day Saint movement, founded by Joseph Smith, Jr. The largest of these denominations, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), accepts the Bible "as far as it is translated correctly" , as well as the Book of Mormon, the Pearl of Great Price, and the Doctrine and Covenants as canonical scripture.
ContentTitle PageThe title page, translated from the last of the golden plates, states:
OrganizationThe format of The Book of Mormon is similar to the Bible in that there are separate books written by different authors who recorded the interactions of God with people. Generally the book is composed of the following books, though editorial divisions in different churches' editions vary:
The book's sequence is primarily chronological. Notable exceptions include the "Words of Mormon," which is an editorial insertion (authored by Mormon), and the "Book of Ether," which is an abridgement by Moroni of an earlier civilization's record. The books of First Nephi through Omni are first-person narratives, as are Mormon and Moroni. The remainder of the Book of Mormon is a third-person historical narrative, compiled and abridged by Mormon. In the version published by the LDS Church ("The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ"), the book also contains a title page (written by Mormon and Moroni), a modern day introduction written by church leaders, the "Testimony of Three Witnesses," the "Testimony of Eight Witnesses," the "Testimony of the Prophet Joseph Smith" concerning the Book of Mormon, "A brief explanation about the Book of Mormon," chapter headings written by Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, a "pronouncing guide" to names and places, footnotes and cross-references to the Bible, and an index. Investigation of the bookThe book invites the reader to make a personal investigation into the veracity of the writings. The invitation is associated with a promise that God will give an undeniable witness of its truthfulness through the Spirit. This can be found in the 10th chapter of Moroni, verses 3-5:
Such a witness is a very personal event and can vary widely, depending on the individual. Of those whom claim to have received a witness, most consider it to be sacred and of great import. In Mormon circles this is most commonly referred to as "a testimony", a knowledge born of faith, prayer and spirit; and the act of telling others of the experience or the faith gained thereby is called "bearing one's testimony". A testimony is claimed to give the seeker assurance of the truth of these matters by seeking answers from God directly. Critics refute the gaining of a testimony by arguing that the evidence against the Book of Mormon is irrefutable, that a testimony is a form of brainwashing by the church and that readers are to gain a testimony and ignore scientific evidence supporting the critics attacks. However, defenders believe that Christ's praise of Peter in Matt 16:16,17 where Peter's knowledge of Christ as the Son of God comes from the Father is worthy of emulation. Further, critics give no evidence of brainwashing techniques. Brief narrative summaryThe following dates, people, and named authors are laid forth in the Book of Mormon.
The book's major themesStated purposesThe purpose of The Book of Mormon, as stated on its original title page, "is to show the remnant of the House of Israel what great things the Lord has done for their fathers" and to convince "Jew and Gentile that Jesus is the Christ, the Eternal God, manifesting himself to all nations." Another Testament of ChristThe crowning event of the Book of Mormon is the visitation of the resurrected Christ to the Nephites around 34 AD, shortly after his ministry in Jerusalem (3 Nephi 11-26). Every prophet in the Book of Mormon teaches about Jesus. An angel prophesied to Nephi that Jesus's birth would be 600 years from the time he and his family left Jerusalem (1 Nephi 10:4, 19:8; See 3 Nephi 1). Many prophets in the Book of Mormon, beginning with Lehi and Nephi, saw in visions the birth, ministry, and death of Christ (1 Nephi 11), and were told his name. (Mosiah 3:8). At the time of King Benjamin, the Nephites were called "the children of Christ" (Mosiah 5:7). The faithful members of the church at the time of Captain Moroni (73 BC) were called "Christians" by their enemies, because of their belief in Christ (Alma 46:13-15). For nearly 200 years after the Christ's appearance at the temple in the Americas, the land was filled with peace and prosperity because of the people's obedience to Christ's commandments (4 Nephi). The great prophet-general Mormon worked to convince the faithless people of his time of Christ (360 AD), and Moroni buried the plates with faith in Christ (See title page). Many others also bore witness to the reality of the Messiah. Some doctrinal teachingsThe following teachings are especially notable in The Book of Mormon:
Dominant narrative themesThe following narrative themes are especially consistent in The Book of Mormon:
Origin of the Book of MormonSee Linguistics and the Book of Mormon for additional information and analysis on authorship. AuthorshipMany different parties have differing views on the origin of the Book of Mormon. If the book is what it purports to be then it is an ancient record, compiled and abridged by Mormon of the pre-Colombian Native Americans, recording the generations of his nation and the teachings of ancient Hebrews. If not, it was written by Joseph Smith and his associates. Joseph Smith as TranslatorIf true then the book is an abridgment of earlier records by Mormon and his son, Moroni (who carried on the work of abridgment after his father's death) at about AD 400. The record was subsequently buried in a stone box in a hillside, where it remained until the time of Joseph Smith. According to the accounts of Joseph Smith and his associates, the original record was engraved on thin, malleable sheets of metal with the appearance of gold and bound with three rings at one edge, much like a modern book. The leaves were engraved on both sides with considerable skill. At the end of Moroni's ministry (around AD 421), he hid these gold plates along with several other artifacts in a stone box. On September 22, 1823, Joseph Smith was directed by God through the angel Moroni to the place where the plates were stored. He was not immediately allowed to take them, but after four years was entrusted with them. Through the power of God he was able to translate the characters (supposedly related to 600 B.C. Egyptian with Hebrew influence () into English. Because the heavy plates were reportedly made of gold (or perhaps gold alloy or gold colored metal), the plates were much sought-after by individuals interested in their monetary value. Joseph admitted that, prior to receiving the plates, he had entertained thoughts of selling them to provide for his family, who were farmers and not particularly wealthy or well-educated. Joseph Smith claimed he was commanded to show the plates to several people and no one else. Accounts by these individuals are recorded in the front of The Book of Mormon as "The Testimony of Three Witnesses" and "The Testimony of Eight Witnesses." Most of the witnesses at some point became disaffected with Joseph Smith's leadership and the church, but none withdrew their testimony of what they signed. After translation was complete, the angel again took the plates from Joseph Smith, and no public account of their whereabouts has been made since. The golden plates were commonly referred to as a "Golden Bible," particularly by non-Mormons, though a few members also used the term in early descriptions. The label "Golden Bible" actually predates the Book of Mormon as legends of such an artifact existed in Canada and upstate New York while Joseph Smith was growing up (Bushman 2005). See Golden Plates Passages from the King James Version of the BibleA substantial segment of the Book of Mormon, namely 2 Nephi chapters 7, 8, and 12-24, matches nearly word-for-word the chapters 50, 51-52:1-2, and 2-14 (respectively) of the King James Translation (1611) of the Book of Isaiah. While a point of argument for those who do not believe the text, latter-day saints accept these passages as obvious quotations from Isaiah by Nephi, the ancient author of that portion of the Book of Mormon. The footnotes and chapter headings acknowledge this and encourage comparisons between Isaiah and 2 Nephi. There are differences in more than half of the 433 verses of Isaiah that are quoted in the Book of Mormon; most are very minor, but some are significant, which may show that Joseph Smith did not copy the KJV word-for-word. Some think he referred to it during the translation, and a few errors in the King James text also exist in the Book of Mormon. It should be noted that this translation from the plates was made into the 1611 KJV literary and linguistic style, which was no longer commonly used when the translation occurred. Alternative explanationsAlternative explanations for the authorship of the Book of Mormon have arisen, all of which are disputed by the Church. Most of these explanations attack the notion of Joseph Smith receiving divine revelations. An incomplete list of alternative origins of The Book of Mormon is given below. (See Dr. Jeff Lindsay's website for additional scholarly in defense of these allegations.) Smith as authorAccording to this view, Joseph Smith simply wrote the Book of Mormon and later claimed to have translated it. This position tends to be the most commonly-held among Smith's critics and non-Mormons in general. Some Latter-day Saint scholars, such as Hugh Nibley, addressed this viewpoint, claiming that it is nearly impossible to write such a book within such a period of time, particularly given that Smith was an unlearned man with little or no knowledge of Hebrew peoples. Forensic evidence is equally debated and remains inconclusive; many of Smith's writings have been preserved, a comparative analysis does not show that Smith or any close to him authored the manuscript. However, some believe there is evidence to indicate that Joseph Smith had both the capability and resources to accomplish this task (Vogel 2004). Another way Smith could have written the Book of Mormon was by means of automatic, or spirit writing. This theory was suggested by Scott C. Dunn and others. Automatic writing refers to the ability to write or dictate text in a relatively rapid, seemingly effortless and fluent manner with no sense of control over the content. The content of automatic texts is often similar to that of the Book of Mormon: Examples include multiple authorship, use of archaic language, accounts of bygone historical figures, descriptions of times and places apparently unfamiliar to the writer, narratives with well-developed characters and plot, accounts of various ministries of Jesus Christ, poetics, occasionally impressive literary quality, doctrinal, theological, and cosmological discussions, and even discourses by deity. More importantly, the manner in which Joseph Smith produced the Book of Mormon, and apparently many revelations and other scriptures as well, bears strong resemblance to the process of automatic writing. For example, there is no indication that Smith used notes or outlines or conducted major reworkings of his materials prior to their initial publication. While such conditions are characteristic of a relatively simple translation task, they are also typical of automatic writing. There are many other characteristics of automatic writing shown in the circumstances surrounding the coming forth of the Book of Mormon (American Apocrypha, Signature Books, pg. 17-46). Smith as a plagiarist of contemporariesIn the early 20th century LDS Apostle B.H. Roberts authored a manuscript entitled , in which he critically examined the claims and origins of The Book of Mormon. In his manuscript, Roberts compared the content of The Book of Mormon with View of the Hebrews, a book written by Ethan Smith (no relation to Joseph), pastor of a church in Poultney, Vermont. View of the Hebrews was published in 1825, some five years before The Book of Mormon and called for recognition of Native Americans as the lost tribes of Israel and for bringing them back into the Christian fold. Speculation regarding the possible origins of the Native Americans was common in the era. David Persuitte, in his book, Joseph Smith and the Origins of The Book of Mormon, shows extensive parallels between passages in View of the Hebrews and in The Book of Mormon, but notes no instances of direct copying, nor does he demonstrate that Smith ever read or even encountered the book. Had he owned a copy, Smith could be said to have been inspired by View of the Hebrews. However, it is known that Ethan Smith had visited Palmyra in support of his book, so the idea of Joseph Smith being exposed to View of the Hebrews is plausible. However, if such plagarism did exist, most blame would have to be placed on the shoulders of Oliver Cowdery. Cowdery was educated and trained as a typesetter/printers assistant in the 1800s and worked at the Poultney Gazette in the summer of 1823 (the paper became the Northern Spectator in December of 1823) when Ethan Smith brought the View of the Hebrews manuscript to be published. Soon thereafter Cowdery left the paper and within a few months Joseph Smith had reported the first divine visitation on the equinox (September 21 1823). The obvious connection being that Oliver Cowdery and Joseph Smith were related and often associated together. This employment at the Poultney Gazette would not have been Cowderys first exposure to View of the Hebrews, his family, including father William and stepmother Keziah, were noted as being longstanding members of Ethan Smiths congregation in Poultney when he arrived and assumed leadership in November 1821. Ethan Smith made no secret of his theories presented in View of the Hebrews during sermons. Some claim Smith plagiarized material from the manuscript for an unpublished novel by Solomon Spaulding. Spaulding's romantic novel has very little in common with the Book of Mormon. Even the story, which revolves around a group of seafaring Romans who sail to the New World around two millennia ago is not relatable to the Book of Mormon. Recently, non-Mormon researcher Thomas Donofrio claims to have found hundreds of parallels between peculiar wordings in the Book of Mormon and the writings of well-known historical and religious figures of the 18th and 19th centuries. Some difficulty is seen with this hypothesis given Joseph Smith's lack of formal education. It is additionally complicated by the two simple facts: first, on the surface the two writings appear to have little in common making thematic plagarism unlikely; second, the Spaulding manuscript is shorter than thirty pages, while the first edition of the Book of Mormon was nearly six hundred pages, making large-scale passage plagarims impossible. One of Smith's colleagues as authorAccording to this theory, someone else (either Sidney Rigdon or some other close friend of Smith) wrote the book and allowed Smith to take credit for it. Given that Smith had only basic literacy at the time, some consider this theory more probable than the view that Smith wrote the book himself. Both Sidney Rigdon and Oliver Cowdery were better educated and could have helped Smith author the book. According to one theory invented by Richard Bushman (2005), after dictating the primary text, Smith and his scribes would spend the evenings poring over the text, editing and making adjustments. In this case, the Book of Mormon would be considered a collaboration between Smith and his scribes, primarily Oliver Cowdery. Sidney Rigdon and Oliver Cowdery both denied having written the book, and in fact Cowdery was one of the Three Witnesses to the Book of Mormon. Even though he became disaffected with Joseph Smith's leadership and with the church and was excommunicated in 1838, Cowdery never denied his testimony of having seen the golden plates and a decade later returned to the church. There is also no evidence that Joseph Smith knew of or was in contact with Sidney Rigdon until after the Book of Mormon was published. Most histories state that Parley P. Pratt, a member of Rigdon's congregation near Kirtland, Ohio, was baptized around September 1830 in Palmyra. Soon after, Pratt returned to Ohio, which is when Rigdon learned of Smith and the Book of Mormon and was baptized. According to these accounts, Rigdon first met Smith in December 1830, nine months after the Book of Mormon's publication. Views of the Faithful
Latter Day Saint viewsThe dominant and widely accepted view among Latter Day Saints is that the Book of Mormon is a true account of the people whose history it documents. Since the time of its publication, it has been common among Latter Day Saints to view and explain the Book of Mormon as a comprehensive history of all Native Americans (Mauss 2004); this understanding of the Book of Mormon is referred to as the "hemispheric model." However, belief in the hemispheric model is an assumption not based on a close reading of the text, nor on the teachings of Joseph Smith, who stated repeatedly that he believed the events in the Book of Mormon took place in Central America. Critics claim that recent DNA studies (disputed by church members — discussed later) show that Native American Indians are primarily descendants of East Asians and they conclude that the hemispheric model is incorrect. The locations of the cities mentioned in the Book of Mormon are not identifiable. Several groups of Mormon apologists (including FAIR and FARMS) have proposed that the city Zarahemla is located somewhere within Central America because of the description given in . This approach, often referred to as the "Limited Geography Model," argues for a more limited view of the Book of Mormon, suggesting that the book is a history of only a small group of Native Americans in Central America. This theory, presented by Joseph Smith and others as early as 1842, has been gaining substantial support recently because it more accurately represents the descriptions given within the text itself. For instance, the populations and civilizations described in the Book of Mormon were too small to fill entire continents; moreover, there is much evidence that one common assumption of the past (that Book of Mormon civilizations were alone in America) is probably incorrect. Critics' viewsSome Mormon and non-Mormon scholars claim to have found archaeological, cultural and linguistic evidence that the book was an ancient record, these conclusions however are not accepted by the majority of scholars. These scholars point to the available history of the four major civilizations in Meso-America in the Book of Mormon time period (Maya, Mixtec, Zapotec and Aztec) where there is archaeological data and some recorded history. Each of these was very advanced in language, writing, mathematics and astronomy. Furthermore, ample evidence has been uncovered of the types of plants, animals and implements available to the early inhabitants. The Book of Mormon clearly makes multiple reference to plants and animals, many of which do not match the time period. Some Logical Errors used in argumentsCritics argue that the Book of Mormon itself contains logical inconsistencies. The two most often discussed relate to poor wording and to the plants, animals and implements mentioned in the Book of Mormon. As with most religious arguments, these arguments will never reach a satisfactory agreement between both parties, and both are presented here for your consideration. Further arguments can be inspected online from - a group critical of Mormonism. "Poor Choice of Wording"A defensive argument offered is that the authors and/or translator(s) of the Book of Mormon used the wrong words to describe unfamiliar items. Critics argue that the language used in the Book of Mormon is reminiscent of the 1611 King James Version of the Bible rather than the English of the time. It is also argued that there is a logical fallacy in that the seer stones used to translate the Book of Mormon should have avoided such poor choices in words and that the defense to this argument, that Joseph Smith was the "weak link" in the translation chain destroys the infallibility of the prophet. Members of the church argue against this, stating that the Book of Mormon is translation literature, and Joseph Smith was inspired to write in words and a format he was used to, (since revelation comes to your mind and then the Holy Ghost manifests the truth of the thing to you) which happened to be the King James Version of the Bible. It is also argued that the very few examples of poor wording are said to be spurious at best. Furthermore, it is argued that Joseph Smith was never held up to be infallible: just as Jonah ran away from his preaching duties, while being referred to as a prophet in the Bible, Joseph Smith was subject to all the faults of men. "Plants and animals"Critics of the church state that there is no evidence of these plants, animals or implements found, therefore disproving the Book of Mormon. It is argued that this statement falls into a logical fallacy known as argumentum ad ignorantiam (argument from ignorance) and takes form as either one of the following cases:
Simply noting the wording used in the book versus what has been uncovered in digs, does not suffice as proof. As is well proven in other sections, much of Meso-America has an unbroken archaeological record, and some advanced written history, mathematics and astronomy. The Mayan civilization, for example, was in many ways more advanced than any old world civilization — including the travellers. If the Book of Mormon is based on historical fact, then the plants, animals and implements would have had to have been introduced, lost, and then re-introduced after the "re-discovery" of the new world by the Spaniards. To avoid the pitfalls of the aforementioned logical fallacy, the petitioner must rely on the unbroken archeological record. Since the record is regarded as being complete and descriptive as to exposing the plants, animals and implements of the time, the fact that the introduction, loss and re-introduction is missing makes the case that those three actions did not take place — one need not worry about the fate of individual items. The Book of Mormon covers perhaps less than 2 millennia. The Meso-American record dates as far back as 30,000 years. To learn more about logical fallacies, read the section on Logical Fallacy. Native American LanguageAnother argument deals with the language to have been used by the indigenous inhabitants of the new world. Most Mormon and non-Mormon scholars believe that other groups of people lived in the ancient Americas. It was commonplace in 1800's America for people to assume the strange tongues spoken by the inhabitants were related to someting equally cryptic: Hebrew. Here is a to a website that lists in compact form 30 books written prior to 1830 which advanced this theory to early 1800's America. It is conceivably an easy theory to accept, as the spoken Native languages are not related to languages in Europe or Asia. For further explanation, visit the following link from Indiana University: and for more on the structure and syntax, visit this link: It is important to mention that expatriated Hebrew-speaking Jews do not typically speak Hebrew outside of closed groups or religious ceremonies. Reasons given for this have typically centered around the persecution Jews have received over the millennia. Most are at the very least bi-lingual and engage others in the local language. Therefore, exposure to Hebrew as a conversational language in 1800's America would have been quite rare. Evidence has been provided that many native inhabitants migrated south from the Siberian-Alaskan entry point over roughly 30,000 years. The groups became fractured enough to develop similarly derived, but differently practiced cultures. In addition, the evidence of Atlantic travel to the Americas with groups, such as the Olmecs, may have introduced African and other language and cultural traits to the Americas. In terms of evidence of advanced thinking, Meso-American cultures developed written language roughly the same time the ancestors of Europe did, yet with no demonstrable connection. This is not to say they were alone; the Iroquois of North America also had advanced writing and language, different yet again. In line with the argument offered in this section, the Hebrew and Egyptian languages at the time of the arrival of the travellers were both quite advanced. To accept that the Book of Mormon is fact, one would have to accept that a culture and its descendants lost knowledge and ability, or accept they and their culture were destroyed by the Lamanites as stated by the Book of Mormon. LDS Funded ArcheologyReturning to the arguments concerning archeological findings, it is incorrect to assume that the LDS has never tried to prove the historicity. In 1951 Thomas Ferguson, a devoted LDS member, petitioned Mormon President David O. McKay to financially back the founding of the New World Archeological Foundation (hereafter NWAF). Ferguson requested at first a 5 year funding grant to dig throughout Meso-America for evidence of the veracity of the Book of Mormon claims. His persistence paid off and the first five years were funded from 1955 to 1959. At the end of this period, additional funding was granted and continues to this day. In a 1961 newsletter Ferguson predicted that although nothing had been found, the Book of Mormon cities would be found in 10 years. Eleven years later in 1972 LDS member Hal Hougey wrote Ferguson questioning the progress given the stated timetable in which the cities would be found. Replying to Hougey as well as secular and non-secular requests, Ferguson wrote in a letter dated 5 June 1972: "Ten years have passed.. I had sincerely hoped that Book-of-Mormon(sic) cities would be positively identified within 10 years — and time has proved me wrong in my anticipation." To date, the NWAF has been continuously unlucky. However, given the light of the logical fallacy presented earlier, this is not a proper argument that the Book of Mormon is false or true. During the period of 1959-1961, NWAF colleague Dee Green was editor of the BYU Archeological Society Newsletter and had an article from it published in the summer of 1969 edition of Dialogue: A journal of Mormon Thought, pp76-78 in which he acknowledged that the NWAF findings did not back up the veracity of the Book of Mormon claims. After this article and another six years of fruitless search, Thomas Ferguson published a 29 page paper in 1975 entitled Written Symposium on Book-of-Mormon Georgraphy: Response of Thomas S. Ferguson to the Norman & Sorenson Papers. The full text will be omitted here, but he summed up as thus on page 29: "I'm afraid that up to this point, I must agree with Dee Green, who has told us that to date there is no Book-of-Mormon geography.." Ferguson wrote a 20 February 1976 letter to Mr & Mrs H.W. Lawrence in which he stated: "..The real implication of the paper is that you can't set the Book-of-Mormon geography down anywhere — because it is fictional and will never meet the requirements of the dirt-archeology" (sic). While each of the aforementioned quoted sources are easily verifiable, critics think it interesting to note that the LDS Church library does contain copies of each, but they are not part of any LDS curriculum. This is not to say the NWAF has found nothing. Quite the opposite, the findings of the NWAF have been invaluable in continuing the unbroken record of Meso-America. Currently BYU maintains 86 documents on the work of the NWAF at the and these documents are used outside both BYU and the LDS church by researchers. DNARecent studies have claimed that Native Americans do not have certain genetic markers in common with modern Middle Eastern DNA samples, and genetic research shows that they are more closely related to people in Asia than anywhere else. These studies have come mainly from Thomas Murphy. and . Critics claim this contradicts the statement found in the introduction of the current edition of the Book of Mormon, which says that the Lamanites, descendents of Hebrews, are the "principal ancestors" of Native Americans, however there is no claim that they are the sole ancestors. There are three different people who are mentioned, of which one may be Asian. In to these arguments, David Stewart states that the studies fail to account for the fact that Ancient Israelite DNA would be vastly different from their modern DNA. He also said that mtDNA testing, which was the cornerstone in both studies, cannot even link different Jewish groups let alone compare them to American Indians faithfully. He concluded that the studies take a very limited and biased approach in order to control the outcome and that the studies ignore other basic DNA facts in order to come to their biased conclusion. This criticism of the science is not generally accepted outside of Mormonism. ArchaeologyFor a detailed discussion about Book of Mormon Archaeology, visit Archaeology and the Book of Mormon Other arguments against the Book of Mormon are made on an archaeological basis, such as the mention of animals that are not known to have been present in the Americas prior to contact with Europe. One specific issue is language, in that the Nephites and Lamanites would have spoken a Semetic language up to at least 400 C.E., where the Book of Mormon stops. However, no spoken semetic language has survived in the Americas to modern times. These critics also feel that the 1,000 years after the end of the period covered in the Book of Mormon do not suffice to account for the difference among Native American languages nor their distance from Semetic languages. A common counterargument is that the Book of Mormon mentions contact with other civilizations with their own non-Semitic languages that might have influenced or supplanted any Semitic language being spoken, and point to written samples of Semetic languages in available archaelogical data. Mormon critics often point to lacking evidence supporting all of Book of Mormon claims. Apologists often counterargue that Meso-American archeaology is a young field and that evidence will eventually surface. One example of lacking evidence is that although horses lived in the ancient americas, there is little evidence that they were domesticated or even co-existed during the time period of the Book of Mormon narrative. Another example of evidence once believed lacking, now found is that the Book of Mormon referred to elephants (Ether 9:19) being brought to America by one of the groups. This claim was refuted by critics as absurd until 1903 when, according to American Antiquarian, 25:395-397, Dr. Nicholas Leon unearthed elephant bones near the town of Paredon, north of the City of Mexico . Currently, most Book of Mormon claims are substantiated, however, a good deal of them are problematic from a dating perspective - some, such as horses (mentioned above), existed in the Americas, but not during the Book of Mormon time period. Role of the Book of Mormon in MormonismJoseph Smith said, “"I told the brethren that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book." (History of the Church 4:461). The Book of Mormon is of prime importance to the church as one of the greatest differentiating factors of the church as well as a spiritual foundation. It is held as a tangible evidence of the truthfulness of the church. Members of the church hold The Book of Mormon as the most important, correct, and basic book of scripture. Not placing enough emphasis on the Book of Mormon or ignoring it all together was decried in a revelation to Joseph Smith that pronounced a condemnation on the "whole church" for treating the Book of Mormon "lightly," until they should "repent and remember the new covenant, even the Book of Mormon and the former commandments which I have given them, not only to say, but to do according to that which I have written, that they may bring forth fruit meet for their Father's kingdom" (Doctrine and Covenants 84:55-58). The importance of studying the Book of Mormon has been stressed by every LDS church president since Joseph Smith, who stated that the Book of Mormon was "the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book." The Book of Mormon's significance was reiterated in the late 20th century by Ezra Taft Benson, Apostle and 13th President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In an August 2005 Ensign message, current LDS President Gordon B. Hinckley challenged each member of the church to reread the Book of Mormon again before year end. The book's importance is commonly stressed at the twice-yearly General Conference and at special devotionals by General Authorities in the First Presidency, the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, and the several Quorums of the Seventy. Claimed differences between the Book of Mormon and Latter-day Saint doctrineCritics of Mormonism argue that the teachings of Book of Mormon are not entirely consistent with Mormon (and/or more specifically, LDS) doctrine. The book's Introduction states that the Book of Mormon "contains, as does the Bible, the fullness of the everlasting gospel," though it does not dictate certain specific doctrines important to Latter-day Saints. These come from other sources, including modern revelation. Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believe that when the church is properly organized, the president of the church is a prophet who receives guidance from God. From his revelations come the doctrines of the church which are treated as God's will, as well as the official interpretation of scripture, even if latter revelation modifies or contradicts earlier revelation. The organization, instructions and even the scriptures may change with the times to meet the current needs of the church, but the basic belief as a whole will remain mostly unchanged. However, it is clear that a few of the doctrinal elements that distinguish Mormonism from other Christian religions are not mentioned in the Book of Mormon.Vital doctrines not found in the Book of Mormon include the origin of God, Baptism for the dead, The Word of Wisdom (the Mormon law of health) and other temple ordinances. It also does not dictate the doctrine of plural marriage, or polygamy. To counter the accusation that the Book of Mormon does not contain "the fullness of the everlasting gospel," some LDS members point to a statement made by Joseph Smith to the effect that the basic and essential ordinances of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are Faith in Jesus, Repentance, Baptism, and Confirmation to receive the Gift of the Holy Ghost, which are taught in the Book of Mormon, and all other doctrines and practices are but appendages to those tenets. Another interpretation of the phrase "fullness of the everlasting gospel" is that the Book of Mormon contains, as does the Bible, the true gospel (the message of Christ's Atonement and of the plan of salvation), untarnished by centuries of misinterpretation. The following passages appear to most observers to conflict with Mormon (and more specifically, LDS) doctrines:
Latter Day Saints counter such arguments stating that critics of the church are intentionally misinterpreting scripture to create arguments to support their own position. It is argued that if critics intend to criticise scriptures that they must use the common interpretations of the scriptures found in the many resources of the church if they seek to disprove doctrines. Book of Mormon EditionsThe Book of Mormon is published today in the following forms:
Some critics have suggested that some of the changes across editions significantly affect the meaning of the Book of Mormon and indicate an agenda inconsistent with the idea of a revealed or inspired book. A portion of these changes have been discussed in official Church publications including the Ensign, Improvement Era, Millennial Star and Times and Seasons, and are consistent with early pre- and post-publication edits made by Joseph Smith. Some corrections were made due to earlier print or copy errors, or changes in punctuation. See Linguistics and the Book of Mormon. References
See also
Links to articles aboutOfficial sourcesSympathetic views
Critical views
Buch Mormon Libro de Mormón Libro de Mormon Livre de Mormon 몰몬경 Libro de Mormon Libro di Mormon Boek van Mormon モルモン書 Mormons bok Księga Mormona Livro de Mórmon Книга Мормонаscn:Lu Libbru di Mormon Kniha Mormónova Mormons bok 摩門經
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||